Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bealer v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 17, 1995No. CA CR 93-365Published

1ConcurrenceMelvin Mayfield, Judge

I concur in the result reached by the opinion written by Judge Cooper but that opinion does not come to grips with an issue that I think should be discussed and decided.

Rule 4-3(j) of the Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals sets out certain requirements to be followed in cases where the attorney wants to withdraw because the appeal is without merit. The. rule concludes that after considering the attorney’s motion to withdraw the appellate court may affirm or reverse the judgment of the trial court “without any supporting opinion.”

However, our appellate court decisions…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API