Cerny v. Salter
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Chandler, Justice:
In this appeal from the Master in Equity, Appellants (Cernys) challenge the constitutionality of S.C. Code Ann. § 15-41-30(11)(B) (Supp. 1992). We affirm.
FACTS
The Cernys obtained a judgment against Respondent Billy Salter for $5,400 plus attorney's fees. The Cernys, in supplementary proceedings to collect the judgment, attempted to attach an annuity which Salter received from the settlement of a medical malpractice suit.
The Master held Salter’s annuity from the malpractice suit exempt from attachment pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 15-41-30(11)(B) (Supp. 1992) (Homestead…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Foster v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Elliott v. MackorellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1883
3Cited by10 opinions
- Davis v. County of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Murphy Ex Rel. Estate of Cheek v. Richland Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Holden v. CribbCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
- In re HoltUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2013
- In Re SimsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.