Legal Opinion

Cerny v. Salter

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 19, 1993No. 23841PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chandler, Justice:

In this appeal from the Master in Equity, Appellants (Cernys) challenge the constitutionality of S.C. Code Ann. § 15-41-30(11)(B) (Supp. 1992). We affirm.

FACTS

The Cernys obtained a judgment against Respondent Billy Salter for $5,400 plus attorney's fees. The Cernys, in supplementary proceedings to collect the judgment, attempted to attach an annuity which Salter received from the settlement of a medical malpractice suit.

The Master held Salter’s annuity from the malpractice suit exempt from attachment pursuant to S.C. Code Ann. § 15-41-30(11)(B) (Supp. 1992) (Homestead…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Foster v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. Elliott v. MackorellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1883

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Davis v. County of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  2. Murphy Ex Rel. Estate of Cheek v. Richland Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  3. Holden v. CribbCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  4. In re HoltUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2013
  5. In Re SimsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API