Legal Opinion
Cooney v. Consolidated Edison
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 6, 2002No. 00 Civ. 4965(JGK)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KOELTL, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Joseph Cooney, brings this action pro se against his employer, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (“Con Ed”). The plaintiff alleges that Con Ed discriminated against him on the basis of an alleged disability, namely Chronic Fatigue Immunity Dysfunctional Syndrome (“Chronic Fatigue Syndrome”), failed to provide him with reasonable accommodations for this condition, subjected him to discriminatory employment conditions, harassed and defamed him, and retaliated against him for filing complaints with the Equal Employment…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sussle v. Sirina Protection Systems Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- JSC Foreign Economic Ass'n Technostroyexport v. International Development & Trade ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Alcantara v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Ainbinder v. PotterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Estevez-Yalcin v. Children's VillageDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.