Legal Opinion

D'ORIO v. West Jersey Health Systems

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided August 10, 1992No. Civ. A. 89-2131 (JEI)PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IRENAS, District Judge:

In this diversity case defendants move for an order, in limine, determining that the provisions of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-12 should be applied to bar the plaintiff from introducing at trial evidence of her medical expenses, notwithstanding that her insurance carrier has paid only $10,000 of these expenses. Resolution of this issue depends on a determination of whether N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 obligates an insurer who issues a policy to a Pennsylvania resident insuring a vehicle registered in that state to provide personal injury protection (“PIP”) required by N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Watson v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Estate of SimmonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  5. Mellk v. SarahsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Dyszel v. MarksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  2. Wray v. GregoryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. Adams v. Keystone Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  4. Government Emp. Ins. Co. v. Allstate Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
  5. BURLINGTON INSURANCE CO. v. Northland Ins. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API