U.S. Aluminum Corporation/texas, a Corporation v. Alumax, Inc., a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
U.S. Aluminum Corporation sued Alumax, Inc. for malicious prosecution. The district court granted Alumax’s motion for summary judgment on the ground of collateral estoppel, 636 F.Supp. 441, and Aluminum appealed. We review the district court’s entry of summary judgment de novo. Fagner v. Heckler, 779 F.2d 641, 543 (9th Cir.1985). We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
In the first lawsuit, Aluminum successfully defended a patent infringement action brought by Alumax’s subsidiary Howmet Aluminum Corp. The district court awarded attorneys…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- One Lot Emerald Cut Stones and One Ring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- John M. Dimidowich, Dba Micro Image v. Bell & HowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Reactive Metals and Alloys Corporation v. Esm, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Mitchell v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Clark v. Bear Stearns & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- OMI Holdings, Inc. v. HowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
- Clark v. Bear Stearns & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Kamilche Company Simpson Redwood Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Lane v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.