Legal Opinion
United States v. Roberto Medina, Daniel Delgado, Also Known as Pepa and Louie Villanueva, Also Known as Tito
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 23, 1996No. 173, Docket 95-1131PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Per curiam
Defendant-appellant Roberto Medina appeals from a judgment entered on February 24, 1995, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Mukasey, J.) convicting him, following a jury trial, of attempting and conspiring to commit a robbery that would affect interstate commerce in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951. The district court determined that it was reasonably foreseeable to Medina that his co-conspirators would carry and brandish firearms during the crime, and for that reason adjusted Medina’s base offense level upward by five levels under U.S.S.G. §§…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Roberto MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Richard SkowronskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- United States v. George ChapdelaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. William B. JamesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. James R. Downing, Samuel Ward, Daniel DruckerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- United States v. MulderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Carlos PachecoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Wayne FabianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Jose P. MolinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.