Legal Opinion

United States v. Jose P. Molina

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 12, 1997No. 877, Dockets 96-1260(L), 96-1308(XAP)PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JON O. NEWMAN, Chief Judge:

This appeal primarily concerns a narrow sentencing issue relating to enhanced punishment for injury to a bystander. The precise issue is whether a specific offense enhancement based on bodily injury to a victim, sustained during the commission of a robbery, may be imposed when the bullet that struck the victim did not come from the weapon of the defendant or his co-eonspira-tors, but from that of an armed guard attempting to fend off the robbery. The question arises on an appeal by the United States from the April 18, 1996, judgment of the District Court for the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. Joseph WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Abdul-Aziz Rashid MuhammadCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. Raoul Rivalta, United States of America v. Fausto RivaltaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. United States v. Arthur MorrisonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. Lionel Reifler, Glenn B. Laken, John M. Black, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. MulderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  4. Ausa Life Insurance Company, Bankers United Life Assurance Company, Crown Life Insurance Company, General Services Life Insurance Company, Life Investors Insurance Company of America, Modern Woodmen of America, Monumental Life Insurance Company, the Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, and the Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Ernst and YoungCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  5. United States v. Mark Kevin HicksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API