Legal Opinion
United States v. Roberto Medina
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 10, 1994No. 939, Docket 93-1541PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBS, Circuit Judge:
Defendant-Appellant Roberto Medina devised a plan to rob his former employer, but feared he would be recognized by co-workers if he was present during the crime. Medina therefore recruited Jose Lopez to carry out the plan, and Lopez in turn recruited two other confederates. Before the date of the planned robbery, Lopez agreed to act as an informant and betrayed Medina’s plot to the police. Count One of the indictment charged Medina and Lopez’s recruits with attempted robbery and conspiracy to commit robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951; and aiding and abetting…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. PeoniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- United States v. Timothy Wayne Morrow (89-5418/5708) and George Mooneyham (89-5710)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- United States v. SpinneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Anthony PipolaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Linwood WilkersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- United States v. John D. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.