Legal Opinion
Toohey v. WYNDHAM WORLDWIDE CORPORATION HEALTH & WELFARE
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided December 2, 2009No. Civil 09-88-STPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HAGGERTY, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Stewart referred to this court a Findings and Recommendation [62] in this matter. The Magistrate Judge recommends that defendants’ Motions to Dismiss [45 and 50] and Motions to Strike Jury Demand [47 and 52] be granted. No objections were filed, and the case was referred to this court.
The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R.Civ.P. 72(b). When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation of the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Perez v. SilvaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2016
- Daniel Emerson Norton v. Israel Jacquez, in his official capacity as Warden, FCI SheridanDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- David Nelson v. State of Oregon, Department of Administrative ServicesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2026
- George Lee Marshall v. Dan RayfieldDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- Jayda Johnson v. Bonneville Billing and Collections, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.