Legal Opinion

Leonard v. Cattahach

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 16, 1997No. 96-3167PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoggensack, J.

The DuPont Mutual Insurance Company (DuPont) seeks review of a default judgment granted against it for failing to timely answer a summons and complaint served on it through the office of the commissioner of insurance pursuant to § 601.73, STATS. DuPont claims that its answer was timely under the extension provisions of § 801.15(5), Stats. Alternatively, even if its answer was filed late, DuPont maintains that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion when it refused to find excusable neglect, denied DuPont's motion for an enlargement of time, and struck the answer. Finally,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hedtcke v. Sentry InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Kania v. Airborne Freight Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Truttschel v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  4. Waushara County v. GrafWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. KenyonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rao v. WMA Securities, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Connor v. ConnorWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Estate of Otto v. Physicians Insurance Co. of Wisconsin, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Mared Industries, Inc. v. MansfieldWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Estate of Otto Ex Rel. Otto v. Physicians Insurance Co. of WisconsinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API