Legal Opinion
Ginn v. Farley
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided July 16, 1979No. 1407, September Term, 1978PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, C. J.
If, as Alexander Pope 1 wrote, “a little learning is a dangerous thing,” 2 then a little learning in law is particularly perilous.
This appeal, from an affirmance by the Circuit Court for Baltimore County of a zoning board decision, reaches us in an unusual posture. One of the appellants, Mary Elizabeth Ginn, is admittedly not an attorney, nor is she an aggrieved party. Yet, she authored the appellants’ brief and appears on the record as one of the appellants.
We shall deal first with Ms. Ginn as a party appellant.
The Court of Appeals, in Bryniarski v. Montgomery County, 247 Md. 137, 230 A. 2d…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bryniarski v. Montgomery County Board of AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- DuBay v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Fairchild Hiller Corp. v. Supervisor of AssessmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- Dal Maso v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Joseph H. Munson Co. v. Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Janiczek v. Dover Management Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Szteinbaum v. Kaes Inversiones Y ValoresDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- BQP Industries, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
- Dustin S. Kolodziej v. James Cheney MasonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.