Leblond v. Townsley
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCary, P. J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages caused by a collision between his automobile and one driven by defendant’s daughter. The answer pleaded contributory negligence. The court, sitting without a jury, found for plaintiff and gave him judgment in the sum of nine hundred dollars.
Appellant urges as grounds for reversal that the court made no finding on the issue of contributory negligence and that, under the evidence, the only finding possible would be one sustaining that defense.
Where such defense is interposed the court must make a finding with reference thereto. (Tucker v. United…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tucker v. United RailroadsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Holt Manufacturing Co. v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Turner v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Arrelano v. JorgensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Huntington v. VavraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kastel v. StieberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- McNamara v. EmmonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Bradbury v. VogeIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- Bradbury v. VogeIdaho Supreme Court · 1969