Legal Opinion
City of Aurora, by and on Behalf of the People of the State of Colorado v. Samuel Mansford Erwin
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 29, 1983No. 82-1317PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); Tenth Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Samuel Erwin is employed as a United States postman in Aurora, Colorado. He was charged with a petty offense under a municipal ordinance following an altercation that occurred in the course of his employment.1 He removed the criminal proceeding from the city’s municipal…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Akin v. Big Three IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Akin v. Ashland Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Gilbert v. Cosco Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Larry A. LongCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Ivar J. Queen v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.