Legal Opinion

Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Larry A. Long

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 21, 1988No. 86-5842PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOWD, District Judge.

The issue in this case is whether the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution requires that a state’s indictment of a federal agent be dismissed before trial, absent an affirmative showing by the state that facts are in dispute as to whether the agent committed the crime within the necessary and proper scope of his federal duties. We hold that the Supremacy Clause does so require, and we affirm the judgment of the district court dismissing the indictment in this case. 637 F.Supp. 1150.

The proceedings below are more comprehensible when presented in the following…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  4. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. United States v. SalemmeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
  2. United States v. LevinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  3. Texas v. KleinertCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  4. State of Wyoming v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  5. State of Ohio v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API