Legal Opinion
Smith v. Smith
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided November 17, 1998No. 97-3187-CIV-MOOREPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
K. MICHAEL MOORE, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendants’ Motion for Mandatory Sanctions (DE # 8).
UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, responses, and the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, the Court enters the following Order.
BACKGROUND
The facts leading to this motion are as follows: In his complaint filed October 2, 1997, Plaintiff Walter Smith (“Smith”) alleged Viragen, Inc. (“Viragen”) owed him 100,000 shares of stock he says he purchased in return for providing services pursuant to a contract between the parties.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Szabo Food Service, Inc. v. Canteen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Overton A. Currie, an Individual v. Cayman Resources CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Fox v. Acadia State BankCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
3Cited by3 opinions
- Smith v. Viragen, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Manchester Mgmt. Co. v. Echo Therapeutics, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Saetes v. expHand, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020