Legal Opinion
Saetes v. expHand, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 25, 2020No. 3:19-cv-06235Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PETER SAETES, et al., Case No. 19-cv-06235-VC Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR v. SANCTIONS; GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE EXPHAND, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 123, 124, 125 Defendants. Peter Saetes and other expHand shareholders sued expHand as well as thirteen people who were allegedly involved in running the company. The plaintiffs claimed that expHand made knowingly false statements to solicit investments. The defendants served the plaintiffs with a proposed Rule 11 motion for sanctions, and the plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- David M. Fink v. James H. Gomez, Director, Diana Carloni NourseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- In Re: Keegan Management Co., Securities Litigation. Michael Moore, and Lieff, Cabraser & Heimann Elizabeth J. Cabraser v. Keegan Management Company, a Delaware Corporation, Michael Moore, and Richard L. Jaeger Feldman, Waldman & Kline v. Keegan Management Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Braunstein v. Arizona Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- DeMarco v. Depotech Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2001
- Smith v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1998