Legal Opinion

Boyd & Mahoney v. Chevron U.S.A. & Cumberland Farms, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 24, 1992No. 00528PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

We address, inter alia, under what circumstances a court may order specific performance of a right of refusal of a piece of property which is part of a multi-state, multi-asset transaction.

Appellants Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. (Chevron) and Cumberland Farms, Inc. (Cumberland Farms), defendants below, appeal the order of the trial court granting specific performance and directing appellants to transfer title to the realty to plaintiffappellee Boyd & Mahoney. Boyd & Mahoney claimed a right of first refusal. Appellants also object to the purchase price the trial court set for Boyd &…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. AM/PM Franchise Ass'n v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Atlantic Refining Co. v. Wyoming National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  4. Driebe v. Fort Penn Realty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Kosco v. Hachmeister, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. E.R. Linde Construction Corp. v. GoodwinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Navasota Resources, L.P. v. First Source Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  3. B&R Oil Company, Inc., Empire Petroleum Partners, LLC, and EPP-Atlas Acquisitions, LLC v. William E. Stoler, Kathlyn Stoler, Jeffrey A. Levy, and Con-Serve, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Oliver, J. v. Ball, L. v. Harmon, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Perrige v. HorningSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API