Legal Opinion

Wolpin v. Prudential Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 30, 1928PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

: Martin, J.

The defendant issued a policy of insurance upon the life of Samuel Wolpin, containing the following provision: “ This policy shall be incontestable after one year from its date, except for non-payment of premium * *

*340It was issued April 1,1926. On December 8,1926, Samuel Wolpin, the insured, died. Due proof of death was furnished to the defendant. The company having failed to pay, the decedent’s widow, the beneficiary, instituted this proceeding to recover the insurance.

On March 16, 1927, the summons and complaint were served on the Superintendent of Insurance as the statutory agent…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance v. Hurni Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Indiana National Life Insurance v. McGinnisIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Wilkinson v. First National Fire Insurance Co. of WorcesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Missouri State Life Insurance v. CranfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  5. Humpston v. State Mutual Life Assur. Co. of WorcesterTennessee Supreme Court · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Killian v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. PrescottSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  3. Maslin v. Columbian Nat. Life Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1932
  4. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. PtohidesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Christensen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API