Legal Opinion
Maslin v. Columbian Nat. Life Ins. Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 11, 1932PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, District Judge.
The plaintiff moves for summary judgment under rule 113. of the Rules of Civil Practice of New York, on the ground that there is no substantial defense to the action. This remedy may be availed of in an action at law in the United States courts, under the Conformity Act (28 USC A § 724). Hess & Bro. v. Small (D. C.) 288 F. 995; Massee & Felton Lumber Co. v. Benenson (D. C.) 23 F.(2d) 107; United States v. Fiedler (D. C.) 37 F.(2d) 578.
The complaint' is the ordinary one in an action on life insurance policies. It sets forth that in. 1927 the defendant issued two…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Van Blaricom v. . DodgsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Wright v. Mutual Benefit Life Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Clement v. Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1898
- Phelps v. . McQuadeNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Robertson v. ColemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Obartuch v. Security Mut. Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Amex Life Assurance Co. v. . Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- United States v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1936
- Western Reserve Life Assurance Co. of Ohio v. CONREAL LLCDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2010
- Strawbridge v. New York Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.