Legal Opinion

National Surety Co. v. Arizona Grocery Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1927No. Civil No. 2540PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

The state engineer entered into a contract with one A. A. Ray, whereby the latter undertook to perform certain work on the PhoenixWickenburg highway. As a condition precedent thereto, Ray was required to, and did execute a bond to tbe state of Arizona, upon which tbe National Surety Company, hereinafter called appellant, was surety. Ray completed his contract in accordance with its terms, and drew from the state engineer all the monies to which he was entitled excepting the sum of $1,679.84. There were many persons, however, who alleged that Ray had failed to pay for labor and material used…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brogan v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Chicago Lumber Co. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Kansas City ex rel. Kansas City Hydraulic Press Brick Co. v. YoumansSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  4. Barker & Stewart Lumber Co. v. Marathon Paper Mills Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. California-Arizona Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commercial Standard Ins. Co. v. WestArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. Associated Pipe & Supply Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
  3. J.F. Tolton Inv. Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Shoshoni Lumber Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Russell v. Central Commercial Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API