Legal Opinion

In re the Probate of the Will of Fehringer

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 23, 1944PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Griffiths, S.

In this probate proceeding petitioners, the executors named in the propounded instrument dated January 5, 1944, have moved to amend their petition by striking out the names of Eugene A. Hegy and George Boochever as parties and to vacate the citation issued to them.

Petitioners allege that at the time of preparing and filing herein the probate petition they were informed that an earlier will allegedly made by decedent and dated October 4, 1941, was in existence and that the respondents Eugene A. Hegy and George Boochever were named therein as executors. Subsequent to the issuance…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re the Probate of the Will of CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. In re HamiltonNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  3. In re the Estate of ErlangerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
  4. In re the Estate of FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  5. In re the Probate of a Paper Propounded as the Last Will & Testament of ZimmermanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of HerbNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  2. In re the Probate of the Will of AspenleiterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1946
  3. In re the Probate of the Will of IrvinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958
  4. In re the Estate of AimsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
  5. In re the Estate of ManvilleNew York Surrogate's Court · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API