In re the Estate of Aims
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Collins, S.
The residuary legatee under the propounded will moves to strike out the answer and objections of respondents Eunice H. Thompson, Mary D. H. Thompson and Elizabeth H. Woodward. These respondents are not distributees of the testator. They have appeared on the basis of an allegation in their answer that they are named as legatees in a will which antedated the propounded instrument and which has not been duly revoked. The prior will has not been produced. The moving party has submitted an affidavit of a witness wherein it is stated that the prior will was intentionally destroyed by the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re the Probate of the Will of CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- In re the Estate of EvansNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
- In Re the Will of EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- In re the Probate of the Will of RoseNew York Surrogate's Court · 1945
- In re the Estate of CohenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Probate of the Will of IrvinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958
- In re RikertNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960
- In re the Probate of the Will of VieillardNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959
- In re the Estate of SaxlNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960