Legal Opinion
San Diego Cnty. Health & Human Servs. Agency v. D.Z. (In re L.L.)
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided August 3, 2017No. D071661PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*907McCONNELL, P.J.
*1305The juvenile court issued an order finding B.S. is a presumed father of L.L., a 10-year-old girl, pursuant to *1306Family Code 1 section 7611, subdivision (d), and also finding he is a third parent pursuant to section 7612, subdivision (c). T.L., another presumed father of L.L., and D.Z., L.L.'s mother (Mother), appeal that order, arguing: (1) there is insufficient evidence to support the court's finding that B.S. is a presumed father of L.L. under section 7611, subdivision (d) ; (2) the court erred in interpreting section 7612, subdivision (c), and by finding B.S. is a third parent…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Steven A. v. Rickie M.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Dawn D. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Martin O.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Roger S.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- R.M. v. T.A.California Court of Appeal · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- C.A. v. C.P., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- In re K.B. CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Segura v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2025