Legal Opinion

ACME Steel Co. v. Eastern Venetian Blind Co.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 7, 1950No. Civ. No. 4265PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Chief Judge.

This is a patent suit involving four patents relating to Venetian blind steel slats and the process and apparatus for their manufacture.

First, the Court points out that infringement of three of the four patents of the plaintiff that are in suit, namely, the two Wilson patents and the Morse patent, has been conceded by the testimony of the defendant’s chief witness, Hughes. As respects these patents, therefore, the question of infringement is no longer an issue in the case. As to the fourth, the Hunter patent, while a similar concession has not been expressly made on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. B. B. Chemical Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Mercoid Corp. v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pierce v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1957
  2. Acme Steel Co. v. Eastern Venetian Blind Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1955
  3. Acme Steel Company v. The Eastern Venetian Blind CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API