Legal Opinion
Acme Steel Company v. The Eastern Venetian Blind Company
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided December 13, 1955No. 7073_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOBIE, Circuit Judge.
Acme Steel Company (hereinafter called Acme) instituted against The Eastern Venetian Blind Company (hereinafter called Eastern) a civil action in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The complaint alleged infringement of Claim 1 of the Wilson patent, No. 2,294,434 (hereinafter called the ’434 patent) relating to a method of forming Venetian blind slats. In a former civil action between these same parties, this claim, and other claims of the ’434 patent were held valid and infringed by Eastern, both by the District Court, 93 F.Supp. 233, and by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Eastern Venetian Blind Co. v. Acme Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
- Acme Steel Co. v. Eastern Venetian Blind Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1955
- ACME Steel Co. v. Eastern Venetian Blind Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1950
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck and Company and the Plymouth Rubber Company, Inc. v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
- Continental Connector Corporation, a Corporation v. Houston Fearless Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Blohm & Voss AG v. Prudential-Grace Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1972
- United States Pipe and Foundry Company v. Woodward Iron CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- Oxy Metal Industries Corp. v. Roper Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1984