Legal Opinion
Dintino v. Echols
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 28, 2003No. CIV.A. 01-3574PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
Theresa A. Dintino (“plaintiff’) filed a complaint against Lt. John Echols, Deputy Commissioner John Norris and the Philadelphia Police Department alleging a number of federal and state causes of action arising from plaintiffs arrest on July 20, 1999. Each cause of action brought by the plaintiff is based upon plaintiffs allegation that Lt. Echols, a Philadelphia police officer, arrested her without probable cause. Under the undisputed facts of this case, the court concludes that no reasonable jury could find that Lt. Echols lacked probable cause…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chronis v. SteinleArizona Supreme Court · 2009
- Adams v. SpringmeyerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Cuvo v. De BiasDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- GAHAGAN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- HART v. GORDONDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.