Legal Opinion

Daughtry v. Cline

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 1944PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSci-ieNCK, J.

The defendant, appellant, sets out in his brief two groups of exceptions relied upon by him for a reversal of the judgment of the court below or for the awarding of a new trial. The first group is based upon the refusal of the court to sustain the demurrer to the evidence duly lodged under G. S., 1-183, and the second group is based upon a portion of the charge relative to the third issue involving the measure of damage.

The evidence tends to show that the plaintiff, "William T. Daughtry, Jr., while engaged as a civil engineer by the Government on a government project let to the defendant, F.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Johnson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Godwin v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Shipp Ex Rel. Shipp v. United Stage Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Elder v. Plaza RailwaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Lassiter v. Raleigh & Gaston RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Beaulieu v. ElliottAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Brooks v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1967
  4. Pruett v. InmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Pascal Ex Rel. Pascal v. Burke Transit Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API