Frank Foster v. Clausen Miller, P.C.

Frank Foster appeals from a grant of summary judgment in favor of Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company (“Fireman’s”). Foster argues on appeal that the district court 2 erroneously concluded that Foster failed to produce any evidence of improper conduct by either Fireman’s or Clausen Miller. Further, Foster claims the district incorrectly concluded that the certain documents were privileged. We hold that no error was made by the district court.

This action arose from the events following a fire at a rendering plant insured by Fireman’s. The law firm, Clausen Miller P.C. was hired by Fireman’s to…