Legal Opinion
United States v. Coonan
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 13, 1990No. 87 Cr. 249(WK)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
WHITMAN KNAPP, District Judge.
Edna Coonan moves for reconsideration of her motion for a new trial under Rule 33 or in the alternative for a reduction of sentence under Rule 35, which I denied in its entirety in my Memorandum & Order of August 3, 1990, 1990 WL 116758. The government asserts that the court is without jurisdiction to entertain the instant application in so far as it seeks reconsideration of the denial of Rule 35 relief. For reasons that follow, the application for reconsideration is granted, and, upon such reconsideration, I adhere to my original decision…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Herbert A. EllenbogenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- United States v. Brett C. KimberlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Ronald StumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. James InendinoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. FriedlandDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- United States v. OshatzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- United States v. Michael MalpiediCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997