Legal Opinion
South Dakota Mining Ass'n v. Lawrence County
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided September 26, 1997No. CIV. 97-5013PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BATTEY, Chief Judge.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
[¶ 1] On November 5, 1996, an initiated ordinance amending ordinance Number 1 of section 5.11 of the Lawrence County Zoning Ordinance was approved by 51 percent of the electorate of Lawrence County. Plaintiffs— South Dakota Mining Association (SDMA), Homestake Mining Company of California (“Homestake”), Wharf Resources (“Wharf’), Golden Reward Mining Company Limited Partnership (“Golden Reward”), Naneco Minerals, Inc. (“Naneco”) and Fred and Iwalana Gali (“Galis”) — have filed a complaint for declaratory judgment pursuant to…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- South Dakota Mining Ass'n v. Lawrence CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- South Dakota Mining Association, Inc. v. Lawrence CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- SD Mining Assoc. v. Jack ColeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998