Gilkes v. Levinson
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Eagen,
In the trial of this personal injury action, the jury awarded plaintiff a substantial verdict. Subsequently, the court en banc entered judgment for the defendant non obstante veredicto. The plaintiff appeals.
Viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff’s cause, the record discloses the following:
Plaintiff, an unskilled worker, was employed by the defendant and her late husband to serve as a handy man around their home. His duties included gardening and attending to the grounds and lawn. On the day in question, he was seriously injured when he slipped and fell…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Labick v. VickerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Faulks v. FischerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
3Cited by5 opinions
- Marcus v. Frankford HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Frederick Hudson Gaskins v. William B. Tarpley, in No. 19398 v. Aeroprojects Incorporated. Appeal of Charles Dana McKinney JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Bowles v. Cohen, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1979
- Frankiewicz v. Reading Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1972
- Michael J. Logan v. G.A.B. Business Service Al Schnabel Charles F. Matesich Rockwood Insurance Company, Miro Sankovich, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992