Legal Opinion

Pristavec v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided July 15, 1985PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant-appellant appeals his convictions in the Superior Court of Kidnapping Second Degree and Terroristic Threatening. He claims that the State failed to bring him to trial within 180 days as required by the Uniform Act of Detainers, 11 Del.C. § 2542, and that the lower court erred by refusing to strike the testimony of a witness who had violated the sequestration order. The Superior Court ruled the Act inapplicable where, as here, the defendant’s term of incarceration in the sending state expires prior to the running of the Act’s 180 day maximum holding period. We agree, and, finding…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. QuirozNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. State v. DunlapCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. OxendineCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. JulianSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  2. State v. ButlerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. Commonwealth v. DestephanoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. State v. HolleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  5. State v. RodriguezNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API