Legal Opinion
R. P. Arkley Lumber Co. v. Vincent
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 13, 1922No. 16993PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
The purpose of this action was to recover damages which accrued by reason of the breach of a contract. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact and conclusions *513of law and a judgment sustaining the plaintiff’s right to recover in the sum of $3,796.90. From this judgment, the defendant appeals.
The appellant, at Seattle, was engaged in the lumber and shingle brokerage business. The respondent was a corporation doing business in the city of Tacoma. On or about April 24, 1920, the appellant sold to the respondent 200,000 feet of 1 x 4 to 12 inch, number 3,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Campfield v. SauerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
- Ransberry v. North American Transportation & Trading Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1900
- Spokane Casket Co. v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Benjamin v. Puget Sound Commercial Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by4 opinions
- Consolidated Pipe Line Co. v. British American Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Norm Advertising, Inc. v. Monroe Street Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1946
- United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- National Grocery Co. v. A. Santaella & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931