Legal Opinion

United States v. Harris

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 5, 1938No. 8816PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEALY, Circuit Judge.

The United States appeals from an order of the District Court confirming a referee’s order allowing in part and rejecting in part a claim in bankruptcy filed by the Government. The claim grew out of a breach by the bankrupt of a contract for the purchase of timber on the Colville Indian Reservation. The questions presented relate to the construction of the contract and the measure of damages to be applied.

The contract, entered into in 1924, was originally between the Superintendent of the Colville Indian School and the Hedlund Box and Lumber Company. It was assigned by…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Central Trust Co. of Ill. v. Chicago Auditorium Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Illinois Central Railroad v. CrailSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Hudson Canal Co. v. Pennsylvania Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1869

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jamison Co. v. Westvaco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. Union Bank v. Allen Blum and Sam BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  3. Navajo Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
  4. A.I. Credit Corp. v. GohresDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2004
  5. Diamond Laundry Corp. v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API