State v. Poole
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHerbert, J.
The question which prompted our allowance of the motion for leave to appeal in this first degree murder case is whether defendant’s contention that the killing was an accident is an affirmative defense, requiring the defendant to establish it by a preponderance of the evidence.
This court has consistently recognized that there are certain “justification[s] for admitted conduct”1 allowed to a defendant in a criminal case, provable for the most part under the plea of not guilty, which are referred to as ‘ ‘ affirmative defenses. ’ ’ As characterized by one authority, they represent not a mere…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. ChildsOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. NoltonOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. StatenOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- Long v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1923
- Hulet v. BarnettOhio Supreme Court · 1841
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by137 opinions
- John W. Byrd, Jr. v. Terry L. Collins, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- State v. CaldwellOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Evans v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Commonwealth v. RoseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- State v. HankersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.