Legal Opinion

State v. Nolton

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1969No. 68-331PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchneider, J.

Under our schema of criminal procedure, every accused enjoys the unqualified right to have the prosecution prove every element of the offense charged beyond a reasonable doubt. Failing this, the defendant is entitled to an acquittal. However, the statutory right (Section 2945.74, Revised Code4) to have the trier of the facts consider and return a verdict of conviction upon lesser degrees of the crime or lesser included offenses, in lieu of conviction of the principal offense, is subject to the underlying principal that the trier shall not be confronted with the option to reach an unreasonable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ChampionOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  2. State v. LoudermillOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Malone v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. State v. LongOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. SageOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. JenkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. ThompsonOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. O'Day v. WebbOhio Supreme Court · 1972

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API