Legal Opinion
People v. Ingram
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided July 2, 1984No. Nos. 83SA153, 83SA443PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUBOFSKY, Justice.
In these consolidated appeals, the People challenge rulings of the Adams County District Court suppressing evidence of telephone calls intercepted by Aurora police officers under authority of a wiretap order issued to the Lakewood Department of Public Safety (LDPS). We reverse the district court rulings and remand these cases for further proceedings.
I
On May 14, 1982, the Adams County District Attorney applied to the district court for an ex parte order authorizing a wiretap on the telephone line of George Ingram and Marcella Hinshaw. The district attorney alleged that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Manuel Glenn Abascal, United States of America v. Paul Gordon FrakesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- People v. LosinnoNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- United States v. Anthony CacaceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. LyonsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1981
- United States v. Reginald Lyons, A/K/A Reggie, A/K/A Casper, United States of America v. Willie Renaldo RoysterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. WahlSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- O'Hara v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2012
- People v. VazquezColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. WahlSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- People v. WahlSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986