Caddo River Lumber Co. v. Henderson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Appellee recovered judgment to compensate damages for an injury sustained by Mm while employed by appellant. The judgment recovered is not complained of as being excessive and it will, therefore, be unnecessary to discuss the extent of the injury.
Appellee and other employees were working on what was called the steel gang. They were engaged in taking up steel rails off crossties. The work was done by using tools called scissors weighing about eighteen pounds, with which twelve men 'would carry a steel rail to the train on which it would be loaded. Small barrels called spike kegs were employed.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railroad Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
- Malco Theatres, Inc. v. MurphySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kroger Grocery Baking Company v. DempseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
- Kroger Grocery Baking Company v. KennedySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
- M. E. Gillioz, Inc. v. LancasterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Neely v. GoldbergSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Lee v. PateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.