Friesen v. Hiatt
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dawson, J.:
This was’ an action to recover on a promissory note. Various defenses were pleaded. The cause was tried by the court without a jury, and judgment was entered in favor of defendant.
The material facts were these: For some time prior to February 23,1918, N. B. Friesen, H. N. Friesen and H. H. Wall were partners in the implement business in Fairbury, Jefferson county, Nebraska. They did business in the firm name of Friesen & Company. The defendant was indebted to the firm on the purchase price of some machinery. In satisfaction of that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kansas Pacific Rly. Co. v. Nichols, Kennedy & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- Smith v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- N. A. Kennedy Butter Tub Co. v. First & Hamilton National Bank of Fort WayneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
- Williams v. Missouri Valley Bridge & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- Big Four Implement Co. v. KeyserSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Early v. BurtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
- Campbell v. BohanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
- Jackovich v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931