State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior Court
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EHRLICH, Judge.
¶ 1 The State seeks special-action relief from the ruling of the superior court that an eight-person jury must reach a unanimous verdict to commit Joel Dee Clements as a sexually violent person in accord with Arizona’s Sexually Violent Persons Act (“Act”). Ariz.Rev.Stat. Ann. (“A.R.S.”) § 36-3701 et seq. We conclude that the court erred in deciding that the Act’s evidentiary standard of “beyond a reasonable doubt” requires a unanimous verdict in a civil case. Therefore, by previous order, we have accepted jurisdiction and granted the relief requested by the State,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Johnson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Apodaca v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Allen v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ugalde v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Haas v. ColosiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- State ex rel. Arizona Department of Health Services v. GottsfieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Burns v. McFaddenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- In Re the Commitment of ConnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.