Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior Court

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 24, 2000No. 1CA-SA 00-0189PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EHRLICH, Judge.

¶ 1 The State seeks special-action relief from the ruling of the superior court that an eight-person jury must reach a unanimous verdict to commit Joel Dee Clements as a sexually violent person in accord with Arizona’s Sexually Violent Persons Act (“Act”). Ariz.Rev.Stat. Ann. (“A.R.S.”) § 36-3701 et seq. We conclude that the court erred in deciding that the Act’s evidentiary standard of “beyond a reasonable doubt” requires a unanimous verdict in a civil case. Therefore, by previous order, we have accepted jurisdiction and granted the relief requested by the State,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Johnson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Apodaca v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Allen v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ugalde v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  2. Haas v. ColosiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. State ex rel. Arizona Department of Health Services v. GottsfieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  4. Burns v. McFaddenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. In Re the Commitment of ConnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API