Legal Opinion

Ugalde v. Burke

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 20, 2003No. 1 CA-SA 02-0277PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GEMMILL, Judge.

¶ 1 The State of Arizona filed a petition accusing Richard Ugalde of being a sexually violent person (“SVP”). Ugalde seeks special action relief from the trial court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the State’s petition. Ugalde argues that because there has been no trial within 120 days of the filing of the petition, Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 36-3706 (Supp.2002) requires that his case be dismissed. We accept jurisdiction, vacate the trial court’s denial of Ugalde’s motion to dismiss the SVP petition, and remand for a further determination in accordance…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  2. State Ex Rel. Romley v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. Arizona Department of Revenue v. DoughertyArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Escalanti v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  5. HCZ Construction Inc. v. First Franklin Financial Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. JOHN C. v. SargeantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. State v. SlaytonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. State v. CofieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  4. Steven Lane Fuller v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  5. In Re the Commitment of Robert FlemmingCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API