Legal Opinion
Universal Acupuncture Pain Services, P.C. v. Quadrino & Schwartz, P.C.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 2, 2004No. 02-9469PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SACK, Circuit Judge.
The appellant, Quadrino & Schwartz, P.C. (“Q & S”), appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Shira A. Scheindlin, Judge) denying Q & S’s request for attorney’s fees in quantum me-ruit to be paid by its former clients, plaintiff-counter-defendant-appellee Universal Acupuncture Pain Services, P.C. (“Universal”), and plaintiff-appellee Dipak Nandi, M.D. (collectively, the “clients”). The clients had retained Q & S under a contingent-fee agreement to represent them in a lawsuit against an insurance company in which the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Lai Ling Cheng v. Modansky Leasing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Diane Leibovitz v. New York City Transit Authority, Joseph Hoffman and Monroe EasterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Matter of TillmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Cohen v. Grainger, Tesoriero & BellNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Judd Burstein, P.C. v. LongDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Weg and Myers, P.C. v. 126 Mulberry St. Realty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- D'Jamoos v. GriffithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- D'Jamoos v. GriffithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- NASDI LLc v. Skanska Koch Inc. Kiewit Infrastructure Co. (JV)District Court, S.D. New York · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.