Legal Opinion

Dackman v. Robinson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 24, 2019No. 60/18PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWatts, J.

In this lead-based paint case, we are once again asked to address issues that are related to the admissibility of expert testimony. Unlike many of the lead-based paint cases that have come before this Court, this case does not involve an issue as to the reasonable probable source of lead exposure or medical causation. Instead, we decide whether the trial court abused its discretion in admitting expert testimony from two of the plaintiff's experts-a vocational rehabilitation expert and an economic expert. The vocational rehabilitation expert opined that, with the cognitive deficits caused by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brooks v. Lewin Realty III, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  2. Beka Industries, Inc. v. Worcester County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  3. Roy v. DackmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  4. Lowery v. Smithsburg Emergency Medical ServiceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Sugarman v. LilesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Alarcon-Ozoria v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  2. Muffoletto v. Towers & Cambridge LandingCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  3. Elkharroubi v. Six Flags America LPDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020
  4. In re: City of HagerstownCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2025
  5. John Thomas McReynolds, Jr. v. Vault E&S Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API