Legal Opinion

Cusick v. Cutshaw

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided September 17, 1948PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodman, J.

This is a controversy over the boundary line between the lands of Harley Cutshaw and Anna Mae Cutshaw, complainants and appellees, on the one hand, and Charlie Cusick and Aubrey Cusick, defendants and appellants, on the other. The parties are the owners of adjoining farms in the Tenth Civil District of Sevier County, Tennessee.

Complainants, in their original bill, invoked the jurisdiction of the Chancery Court under the provisions of Sections 10368 and 10369 of the Code of Tennessee. Having* set forth the respective titles to the subject properties, they averred the correct boundary line…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coal & Iron Co. v. CoppingerTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Mathis v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
  3. Pullen v. HopkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Hicks v. TredericksTennessee Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Wattenbarger v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mix v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  2. Norman v. SmedleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. Bone v. LogginsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  4. Stoker v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Patterson v. T. J. Moss Tie Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API