Legal Opinion

Ricci v. Godin

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 2, 1987PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFFORD, Justice.

The plaintiff, Gary Ricci, appeals a judgment of the Superior Court, Kennebec County, establishing the boundary between two parcels of land located in Rome, one owned by Ricci, the other by Robert and Muriel Godin, adjoining and to the east of Ricci’s land. 1 Ricci contends that the court’s finding regarding the location of the disputed boundary was clearly erroneous. We agree and vacate for further proceedings.

Ricci and the Godins own adjoining parcels of land in Rome. Both parcels were once part of a tract owned by George Tib-betts and are bounded on the north by Route…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Harmon v. EmersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  2. Hodgdon v. CampbellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  3. Sargent v. CoolidgeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  4. Perkins v. ConarySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  5. Conary v. PerkinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Taylor v. HansonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
  2. Theriault v. MurraySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
  3. Milligan v. MilliganSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  4. Tremblay v. DiCiccoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  5. Harborview Condominium Ass'n v. PinardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API