Allen v. Wildman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Blaine County; J. R. Tolbert, Judge. Action by Jacob Wildinan against S. M. Allen. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
This proceeding in error is prosecuted to review the action of the trial court wherein the defendant in error, as plaintiff, contested the title of the plaintiff in error, as defendant, to the office of county commissioner for the First eommissoners’ district of Blaine county!
The parties will be herein referred to in the order and style in which they appeared in the trial court.
Issues having been joined, the cause was tried to the court without a jury. Findings of fact and conclusions of law were made as follows:
“(1) Plaintiff and defendant are and were citizens and electors of commissioners’…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jantzen v. Emanuel German Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Shuler v. LashhornSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- Brown v. First National Bank of TempleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Arizona Eastern Railroad v. Globe Hardware Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1913
- Erickson v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Coleman v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Taylor v. NuetzelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- Papoose Oil Co. v. RaineySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Harn v. Interstate Bldg. & L. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Papoose Oil Co. v. SwindlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.