Legal Opinion

Living Designs, Inc. v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 5, 2005No. 02-16947, 02-16948, 02-16951, 04-16354PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMAS, Circuit Judge.

In these consolidated cases, Plaintiffs Living Designs, McConnell, Inc., Anthuri-um Acres, Matsuura, and Fuku-Bonsai allege that Defendant E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company (“DuPont”) fraudulently induced the settlement of their prior products liability litigation. We reverse the district court’s grant of judgment on the pleadings in favor of DuPont on Plaintiffs’ claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968 (“RICO”), and the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of DuPont on Plaintiffs’ state tort…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Robin Orr v. Bank of America, Nt & SaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. In re Myford Touch Consumer Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  2. Bias v. Wells Fargo & Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
  3. Liliya Turubchuk v. Southern Illinois Asphalt CompCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  4. Flores v. Emerich & FikeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006
  5. Ellis v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2013

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API