Legal Opinion
Tsz Ki Yim v. Home Indemnity Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 30, 1982No. Civ. A. No. 79-2122PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ARTHUR L. BURNETT, Magistrate.
Third Party Defendants Max Wolman Company, a District of Columbia Corporation, and Adele Wolman, as Administratrix of the Estate of Max Wolman, Deceased, on March 9, 1981 filed a motion to reconsider this Magistrate’s Order of January 29,1981, which granted the defendant’s motion for leave to file a third party complaint against the third party defendants. Counsel has urged that the Wolman defendants cannot be subject to a third party complaint for indemnification arising from the circumstances of this case since the applicable statute…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Keleket X-Ray Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Georgia Hall and Edward Hall v. General Motors Corporation, Buick Division, Larry Buick, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Schott v. Colonial Baking Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1953
- Corning Glass Works, Third-Party v. Puerto Rico Water Resources Authority, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1968
- Globig v. Greene & Gust Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- East Mississippi Electric Power Ass'n v. Porcelain Products Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1990
- Elliott v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANYDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2020