East Mississippi Electric Power Ass'n v. Porcelain Products Co.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
TOM S. LEE, District Judge.
This cause is before the court on the motion of defendant Holnam Inc. (hereinafter Ideal) 1 for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Alternatively, Ideal seeks partial summary judgment on a variety of claims asserted against it in this litigation. Plaintiffs and defendant/cross-plaintiffs Knox Porcelain Corporation (Knox) and Porcelain Products Company (Inc.) (Porcelain) have responded to Ideal’s motion and the court has considered the memoranda of authorities together with attachments submitted by…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Mitchell v. CraftMississippi Supreme Court · 1968
- Mustang Fuel Corporation, a Corporation v. Youngstown Sheet and Tube Company, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Pullman Standard, Inc. v. Abex Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1985
- Ford Motor Company v. LononTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Consol. Vista Hills LitigationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Amrep Southwest, Inc. v. Shollenbarger Wood Treating, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Coleman v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1996
- Elliott v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANYDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2020
- Keener v. Dollar General CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2021