Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Mowell

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 4, 1887PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, in Equity. This appeal was taken from a decree dismissing the bill of complaint. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

We do not agree with the learned Judge of the Court below in holding that Mrs. Hawkins is not a competent *532witness in this case, and in our opinion she is competent, whether she be regarded as a nominal or a necessary party to the suit. The Evidence Act has removed all disqualification founded upon interest, and mada the parties litigant cojnpetent and compellable to give evidence in all save a few well defined cases. One of these exceptions is that “ when an original party to a contract or cause of action is dead, or shown to he lunatic or insane, or when an executor or administrator is a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Milholland v. TiffanyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
  2. Wright v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
  3. Dilley v. LoveCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
  4. Horner v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
  5. Glenn v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1861

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hill v. Cross Country Settlement, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Lipsitz v. ParrCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  3. Kaliopulus v. LummCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
  4. Parsons v. UrieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  5. White v. ShafferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API